Differential auxin concentration effects on rooting performance of various cutting types in Tecomella undulata (Roxb.) Seem

Document Type : Scientific Letters

Author

Natural Resources and Watershed Management Research Division, Bushehr Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Bushehr, Iran

10.22092/irn.2025.369428.1649

Abstract

The limitations of sexual reproduction and severe degradation of Tecomella undulata natural habitats in Iran require the development of vegetative propagation methods using rooting hormones. Semi-hardwood and hardwood cuttings (aerial and rhizome) were collected from natural habitats during May. A factorial completely randomized design was employed with two cutting types (stem and rhizome), two cutting types (semi-hardwood and hardwood), and three auxin treatments at varying concentrations (0, 1500, and 3000 mg L⁻¹), with six replicates. Cuttings were treated for 5 minutes with solutions containing indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), or their combination (NAA+IBA), each mixed with 10 mL of Carbomer 940 gel to enhance solution adhesion. Treated cuttings were planted in plastic pots containing moist sandy substrate. Results showed that the NAA+IBA combination induced a 3-5 fold increase in rooting percentage of aerial cuttings compared to controls (16.33%). In contrast, rhizome cuttings exhibited consistent rooting success (>83.33%) regardless of auxin treatment, showing no statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). These findings indicate that for T. undulata propagation: (1) aerial semi-hardwood and hardwood cuttings require NAA+IBA treatment at 1500 mg L⁻¹ for optimal rooting, while (2) rhizome cuttings root effectively without hormonal treatment.

Keywords


Arya, H.C. and Shekhawat, N.S., 1986. Clonal multiplication of tree species in the Thar desert through tissue culture. Forest Ecology and Management, 16: 201-208.
Bhansal, I.R., 1993. Bud culture for shoot multiplication and plantlet formation of Tecomella undulata (Rohida), a woody tree of the arid zone. Tropical Science, 3: 31-38.
Davies, F.T., Geneve, R.L. and Wilson, S.B., 2010. Hartmann & Kester's Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices. 8th edn. Upper Saddle River: Pearson, pp. 234-237. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73945-8
Ghavami, F. and Lajevardi, M., 2010. Indoll-3-butyric acid (IBA) and its effects on plant growth. Iranian Journal of Plant Physiology, 1(1): 32-39.
Hartmann, H.T., Kester, D.E., Davies, F.T. and Geneve, R.L., 2014. Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices. 8th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, pp. 412-415.
Karami, A. and Salehi, H., 2010. Adventitious root formation in Rohida (Tecomella undulata (Sm.) Seem) cuttings. Propagation of Ornamental Plants, 10(3): 163-165. DOI: 10.1007/s12229-010-9055-7
Kumar, A. and Sharma, P., 2018. Ecological importance of Tecomella undulata in arid regions', Journal of Arid Environments, 150: 45–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.12.005.
Kumar, R., Singhal, S. and Misra R., 2008. Rohida micro-propagation. Annual Report 2007-2008. Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun, India, 255p.
Leakey, R.R.B., 2014. Vegetative propagation of medicinal desert trees. Journal of Arid Environments, 102: 104-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.11.006.
Mughal, A.H., Khan, M.W. and Srivastava, R.K., 2013. Role of Tecomella undulata in desert soil stabilization. Arid Land Research and Management, 27(3): 278–291. DOI: 10.1080/15324982.2012.719570.
Nandwani, D., Mathur N. and Ramawat K.G., 1995. In-vitro shoot multiplication from cotyledonary node explants of Tecomella undulata. Gartenbauwissenschaft, 60: 65-68.
Pandey, S. and Gupta, R., 2015. Asexual propagation of Tecomella undulata for arid land restoration. Ecological Engineering, 84: 1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.06.020.
Singh, R.P., Kumar, S., Sharma, A. and Meena, R.K., 2020. Sand dune fixation using Tecomella undulata in the Thar Desert. Journal of Environmental Management, 265: 110532. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110532.