Natural features and management areas of Khamir and Gheshm mangrove forests

Document Type : Over looking Iranian Nature

Authors

1 Postdoctoral student, Department of Environmental Science, Natural Resources Faculty, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Environmental Science, Natural Resources Faculty, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

10.22092/irn.2023.362533.1523

Abstract

Mangrove forests are considered one of the most productive components of coastal food chains and a source of energy supply. They provide various goods and services with ecological, economic, socio-cultural, and aesthetic benefits to meet society's needs. However, mangrove forests are considered one of the most sensitive and vulnerable habitats in the face of environmental hazards and human pressures. Accordingly, the study investigated the natural features of the Khamir and Qeshm mangrove forests and management boundaries in this area. According to previous studies, it cannot be limited to administrative borders and country divisions to protect and plan this natural habitat according to its conservation history. Instead, it should be protected and managed by considering the biological border and the distribution of mangrove forest cover in this area. Therefore, multifaceted conservation management of the country's unique mangrove habitat requires that its ecosystem services be planned in the framework of a management plan based on habitat zoning. In addition, the development of human activities in this area should be planned within management and protection limits.

Keywords


.Alongi, D.M., 2002. Present State and Future of the World’s Mangrove Forests. Environmental Conservation, 29: 331-34
Azizi Jalilian, M., Shayesteh, K., Danehkar, A. and Salmanmahiny, A.R., 2020. A new ecosystem-based land classification of Iran for conservation goals. Environmental-Monitoring-and-Assessment, 192: 182.
Barreto, M.B., 2004. Spatial and temporal changes in salinity and structures of mangroves in Cuare Gulf, Venzuela. Acta Botanica Venezuelica, 24: 63–79.
Biswas, P.L. and Biswas, Sh.R., 2019. Mangrove Forests: Ecology, Management, and Threats. Life on Land, 1-14.
Bosire, J.O., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Walton, M., Crona, B. I., Lewis III, RR., Field, C., Kairo, J.G., and Koedam, N., 2008. Functionality of restored mangroves: A review, Aquatic Botany, 89: 251–259.
Cardona, P., and Botero, L., 1998. Soil characteristics and vegetation structure in a heavily deteriorated mangrove forest inthe Caribbean coast of Colombia. Biotropica, 30: 24–34.
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, Sh., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., and van den Belt, M., 1997. The value of the world’s ‎ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253–260. ‎
Cuc, N.T.K., and Ninomiya, I., 2007. Allometric relations for young Kandelia candel (L.) Blanco plantation in Northern Vietnam. Journal of Biological Sciences, 7 (3): 539-543.
Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Mafaziya, N.T., Huge, J., Dahdouh-Guebas, Y,D., Nitto, D., Hamza, A.J., Kodikara -Arachchilage, S., Koedam, N., Mancilla-Garcıa, M., Mohamed, M., Mostert, L., Munga, C.N., Poti, M., Satyanarayana, B., Stiers, I., Van Puyvelde, K., Vanhove, M.P.M., Vande Velde, K., and Ratsimbazafy, H.A., 2022. The Mangal Play: A serious game to experience multi-stakeholder decision-making in complex mangrove socioecological systems. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9: 909793.
Dinerstein, E., Olson, D., Joshi, A., Vynne, C., Burgess, N.D., Wikramanayake, E., Hahn, A., Palminteri, S., Hedao, P., and Noss, R., 2017. An Ecoregion-Based Approach to Protecting Half the Terrestrial Realm, BioScience, 67 (6): 534–545.
Gandhi, S., and Jones, T.G., 2019. Identifying mangrove deforestation hotspots in South Asia, Southeast Asia and Asia-Pacific. Remote Sensing, 11 (6): 728.
Getzne, M., and Shariful Islam, M., 2020. Ecosystem Services of Mangrove Forests: Results of a Meta-Analysis of Economic Values. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (16): 5830.
.Global Mangrove Alliance (GMA). 2022. Mangrove Forests Annual Report. The State of the World’s Mangroves, 49p
Hakim, L., Siswanto, D., and Makagoshi, N., 2017. Mangrove Conservation in East Java: The Ecotourism Development Perspectives. Journal of Tropical Life Science, 7 (3): 277-285.
Hamilton, S.E., and Casey, D., 2016. Creation of a high spatio-temporal resolution global database of continuous mangrove forest cover for the 21st century (CGMFC-21). Global Ecology and Biogeography, 25 (6): 729-73.
Heumann, B.W., 2011. Satellite remote sensing of mangrove forests: Recent advances and future opportunities. Progress in Physical Geography, 35 (1): 87-108.
Idajati, H., Pamungkas, A., and Kukinul Siswanto, V., 2016. The Level of Participation in Mangrove Ecotourism Development, Wonorejo Surabaya. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227: 515-520.
International Union for Conservation of Nature, (IUCN). 2006. Conservation Benefits of Mangroves, IUCN policy brief. 1-6p.
Jia, M., Wang, Z., Mao, D., Ren, Ch., Song, K., Zhao, Ch., Wang, Ch., Xiao, X., and Wang, Y., 2023. Mapping global distribution of mangrove forests at 10-m resolution. Science Bulletin, 68 (12): 1306-1316.
Kissinger, N., Syahrin Noor, A., Muhayah, N.P., and Violet, R., 2020. The Potential of Mangrove Forest as Natural Tourism Area Based on the Flora-Fauna Characteristics and Social Aspect Case Study: Mangrove Forest in Angsana Village. BIO web of conferences, 20: 1-4.
Kuenzer, C., Bluemel, A., Gebhardt, S., Quoc, T.V., and Dech, S., 2011. Remote Sensing of Mangrove Ecosystems: A Review. Remote Sens, 3 (5): 878-928.
Lovelock, C.E., Feller, I.C., Reef, R., Hickey, S., and Ball, M.C., 2017. Mangrove dieback during fluctuating sea levels. Scientific Reports, 7 (6):1680.
Mäntymaa, E., Jokinen, M., Juutinen, A., Lankia, T., and Louhi, P., 2021. Providing ecological, cultural and commercial services in an urban park: A travel cost–contingent behavior application in Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 209: 104042.
McKee, K.L., 1996. Mangrove ecosystems: definitions, distribution, zonation, forest structure, trophic structure, and ecological significance. In: Feller IC, SitnkM (eds) Mangrove ecology: a manual for a field course. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, p:15–22.
Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D'Amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Loucks, C.J., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P., and Kassem, K.R., 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience, 51 (11): 933-938.
Pham, T.D., and Yoshino, K., 2016. Impacts of mangrove management systems on mangrove changes in the Northern Coast of Vietnam. Tropics, 24 (4): 141-151.
Polidoro, B.A., Carpenter, K.E., Collins, L., Duke, N.C., Ellison, A.M., Ellison, J.C., Farnsworth, E.J., Fernando, E.S., Kathiresan, K., Koedam, N.E., Livingstone, S.R., Miyagi, T., Moore, G.E., Nam, V.N., Ong, J.E., Primavera, J.H., Salmo III, S.G., Sanciangco, J.C., Sukadjo, S., Wong, Y., and Yong, J.W.H., 2010. The Loss of Species: Mangrove Extinction Risk and Geographic Areas of Global Concern. PLoS ONE, 5: e10095.
Richards, D.R., and Friess, D.A., 2016. Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000–2012. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113 (2): 344-349.
Samadi Kuchaksaraei, B., Danehkar, A., Fatemi, S.M.R., Jozi, S.A., and Ramezani-Fard, E., 2020. An investigation on the human impact intensity on the selected ecoregions of coastal areas of Hormozgan Province, Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, South of Iran. Journal of Environment, Development, and Sustainability, 23 (4): 5328-5344.
Senger, D.F., Saavedra Hortua, D.A., Engel, S., Schnurawa, M., Moosdorf, N., and Gillis, L.G., 2021. Impacts of wetland dieback on carbon dynamics: a comparison between intact and degraded mangroves. Science of the Total Environment, 753: 141817.
Spalding, M., and Parrett, C.L., 2019. Global patterns in mangrove recreation and tourism. Marine Policy, 110: 103540.