Ex-situ conservation of Hyrcanian boxwood

Document Type : Scientific Letters

Authors

Caspian forest tree seed center manager- Afforestation, forest parks, and reserves bureau- Forests, rangelands, and watershed organization

Abstract

The loss of earth’s biodiversity is accelerating at an unprecedented rate and proceeding at all levels of ecosystems, species, and genetic resources. Processes related to biodiversity protection are performed to implement the best protection strategies, in which there are two protection strategies (in-situ/ex-situ) with different techniques. Although in-site conservation strategies provide the best option for long-term biodiversity conservation, the short-term survival of many endangered species depends on ex-situ conservation strategies. Hyrcanian box tree, one of the few evergreen forest trees in the region, faced two basic problems, box blight disease (2012) and box tree mouth (2016), resulting in vast habitat destruction during the 1990s.  In this regard, two different ex-situ conservation methods were proposed (1) seed Cryopreservation for the long term and (2) planting outside of natural habitats.  In the second method, some parts, which had been afforested with different species in the past years, were considered, and the seedlings produced in public and private nurseries were planted in it. In this project, a total of 60036 seedlings were planted in an area of about six hectares as an ex-situ conservation stand. As the planting development program continues, the existing area will increase to 13 hectares, and the number of seedlings planted will increase to nearly 130,000.

Keywords


Akçakaya, H.R., Bennett, E.L., Brooks, T.M., Grace, M.K., Heath, A., Hedges, S., Hilton‐Taylor, C., Hoffmann, M., Keith, D.A., Long, B. and Mallon, D.P., 2018. Quantifying species recovery and conservation success to develop an IUCN Green List of Species. Conservation Biology, 32(5): 1128-1138.
Altieri, M.A. and Merrick, L., 1987. In situ conservation of crop genetic resources through maintenance of traditional farming systems. Economic Botany, 41(1): 86-96.
Balmford, A., Beresford, J., Green, J., Naidoo, R., Walpole, M. and Manica, A., 2009. A Global Perspective on Trends in Nature-Based Tourism. PLoS Biol. 7(6): e1000144.
Balmford, A., Kroshko, J., Leader-Williams, N. and Mason, G., 2011. Zoos and captive breeding. Science, 332: 1149-1150.
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity)., 1992. Article 9: Ex-Situ Conservation. Convention on Biological Diversity, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. cbd.int/convention/text/default.shtml
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity)., 2010. Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020. Further Information Related to the Technical Rationale for the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, Including Potential Indicators and Milestones. UNEP/CBD/COP/10/INF/12/ Rev.1. Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Nagoya, Japan. cbd.int/kb/record/meetingDocument/ 77515?Event=COP-10.
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity)., 2014. Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Canada. cbd.int/gbo4
Gant, J.R., Mair, L. and McGowan, P.J., 2020. Fragmented evidence for the contribution of ex situ management to species conservation indicates the need for better reporting. Oryx, 55(4): 573–580
IUCN/SSC (International Union for Conservation Nature/Special Survival Commission)., 2014. Guidelines on the Use of Ex Situ Management for Species Conservation. Version 2.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland.
McGowan, P.J.K., Traylor-Holzer, K. and Leus, K., 2016. IUCN guidelines for determining when and how ex situ management should be used in species conservation. Conservation Letters, 10(3): 361-366.
Redford, K.H., Brooks, T.M. and Nicholas, B.W., 2019. Genetic frontiers for conservation: an assessment of synthetic biology and biodiversity conservation: technical assessment. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, 16p.